SHOP FINES
Mavis Tire will pay $215,000 over charges for work customers did not need

Photo by Mavis Tire

Mavis Tire agreed to pay $215,000 in relief to Pennsylvania customers to settle a case brought by the state attorney general. Court documents say Mavis employees told customers to authorize work that was not reasonably necessary for the safe or proper operation of their vehicles, then took payment for it. In other cases, customers paid for services the shop never completed, or for work that was not done in a skilled manner.

Attorney General Dave Sunday said consumers trust mechanics to give reliable advice, and the settlement returns money to people who paid for work they did not need. Of the total, $190,000 goes to consumers who already filed a complaint or file one by January 26, 2027. The remaining $25,000 covers costs. Mavis runs more than 130 locations in the state.

Why it matters: Stories like this one shape how your next customer walks in the door. Every headline about a chain selling unnecessary work makes people a little more suspicious of the recommendation you just made, even when yours is sound. The defense is documentation. Photos, measurements, and a written explanation of why a part needs replacing all give a skeptical customer something to look at instead of just your word. Shops that already run digital inspections have an advantage here, and it shows up most in exactly these moments.

RIGHT TO REPAIR
Independent dealers push four priorities in Washington

Photo by Corcoran

The National Independent Automobile Dealers Association brought members to Capitol Hill this week for its 12th annual policy conference. Top of their list is the REPAIR Act. Rather than push it as a standalone bill, NIADA wants Congress to attach it to the big highway funding package moving this year. Bills that ride along with must-pass legislation have a much better shot. The REPAIR Act would stop automakers from using technical or legal barriers to block access to diagnostic data, repair information, and tools.

Second on the list is the PART Act, a bipartisan bill aimed at catalytic converter theft. It would require traceable identifiers on new converters. It would also fund voluntary VIN marking for converters already on the road and create federal penalties for trafficking stolen ones.

Why it matters: Both bills touch your shop directly. The REPAIR Act decides which jobs you can do in house and which ones you hand to a dealer. That question has not gotten easier as cars get more locked down. The PART Act goes after a problem you probably see every month. Marked converters are harder to sell, and harder to sell means fewer get cut off in the first place. Neither one is law yet. But they show what the industry is pushing for, and the highway bill is the vehicle to watch.

GOVERNMENT POLICY
California sets new rules for glass shops and calibration

Photo by Liberty Flagpoles

Governor Newsom signed SB 988, the Motor Vehicle Glass Act, which takes effect January 1, 2027. The law gives policyholders filing first-party glass claims the right to pick where both the glass work and the ADAS recalibration happen. That choice covers independent shops, network and non-network shops, dealerships, and qualified specialists. Insurers may still recommend a shop and explain coverage, but they cannot tie claim payments to using a particular one, and they cannot mislead, threaten, or coerce a customer into a choice.

The shop-level rules land on businesses primarily engaged in glass replacement. Before touching the vehicle, those shops must tell the customer whether it has ADAS, whether the manufacturer calls for calibration after windshield work, and whether the shop intends to perform that calibration to spec. If it cannot, it must say the vehicle should go to a certified dealership or qualified specialist. After a calibration, the shop must report in writing whether it worked, and warn the customer not to rely on the system if it did not. Violations carry penalties up to $500 for a first offense and $2,000 after that.

Why it matters: An earlier version of this bill would have covered any shop that replaces glass as part of a larger job, which would have pulled in collision shops. The final version narrowed it to shops primarily doing glass work. Still worth reading closely if glass is a meaningful part of your revenue. The bigger signal is the written calibration result. California is making the outcome of a calibration a documented, disclosed thing rather than something buried in a work order, and that is the kind of requirement other states tend to copy.

Quick Hits:

🏢 VIVE Collision acquired Above All Collision Center in Concord, New Hampshire, adding to a network that now spans 10 states across the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic.

🪟 GM is recalling 29,347 Cadillac Optiq vehicles because front power windows may fail to stop and reverse on an object during the last 13 millimeters of express-up travel from the key fob, fixed with a software update.

🔧 Land Rover is recalling 783 Range Rover Sport SUVs from 2024 through 2026 over rear subframes that can crack, after a supplier forging defect turned up in June and a photo review of production images found more.

🔩 Gates completed its acquisition of Timken's belts business, picking up manufacturing capacity in North America including a plant in Mexico.

🎗️ An Abra franchise in Bismarck, North Dakota raised $5,500 for a local cancer center at its annual car show, and gave away a fully restored 2019 Camry rebuilt with donated parts and labor.

One question for you: What do you think about California requiring glass shops to put calibration results in writing? Useful protection, or paperwork that slows the job down? Hit reply and tell us where you land.

How did we do today?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Thanks for reading. Send us any feedback too. We read all of it.

Keep Reading